Dyract AP
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
IFU Link
Claim 1:
Direct restorations of all cavity classes in posterior teeth
Claim 2:
Direct restorations of all cavity classes in anterior teeth
.
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 /
Total score = 0
Liu Yingfeng, Li Jinshu, Bu Zhigang, Wang Guoding, Bai Yin. Clinical comparative study of restoring wedge-shaped defect with Dyract compomer and composite resin.Acta Acad Med CPAPF 2005; 14: 529.
Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent. 2004 Jun;17(3):147-50.
Dulan Li Chunrong. Two kinds of materials to repair wedge-shaped defect I clinical effect report. Chin Commm Phys-Med Prof 2011; 16: 162.
Zhang Xiuchang. Observation on the clinical efficacy of different filling materials in the treatment of senile root caries. Chin Comm Phys-Med Prof 2012; 35: 45.
ZHAO Qiong-zhi, LIU Bing. CLINICAL EVALUATIoN FoR RESTORATIONS ON CERVICAL WEDDGE -SHAPED DEFECTS OF TEETH USING THREE KINDS OF MATERIALS. Chin J Aesthet Med 2002; 11: 581.
Huo Zhiqiang. Comparison of the clinical effects of two kinds of materials for restoration of the wedge-shaped defect. Chin J Dent Mat Dev 2013; 22: 167.
WANG Ping ,WU Jian, TANG Qian, LIANG Huan-you, HUAN G Nan-nan. Clinical observation of flowable composite on the restoration of root caries in the elderly. Chin J Geriatr Dent 2007; 5: 31.
Peng Qiming, Cai Lifang. Comparative observation and evaluation of the effect of different materials in the treatment of dental wedge-shaped defects. Chin Pract Med 2016; 11: 124.
LI Su-zhen,et al. Clinical trial of restoration of dental wedge-shaped defects with three diferent materiats. Hainan Med J 2007; 18: 47.
WANG Yan ,PENG Hua-guang. Clinica1 Study of Three Different Materials on The Restoration of Teeth Wedge--shaped Defects. Inner Mongol Med J 2006; 7: 595.
Onal B, Pamir T. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Nov;136(11):1547-55.
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent. 2012 Dec;40(12):1060-7.
Liu Jianguo. Observation on the curative effect of Dyract AP light-cured composite in repairing wedge-shaped defects. J Dali Coll 2004; 5: 40
.
Huang Xinghui, Wang Zhouxuan. Observation of repairing wedge-shaped defects with two materials. Jiangxi Med J 2015; 50: 577.
Abdalla AI, Mahallawy SE, Davidson CL. Clinical and SEM evaluations of three compomer systems in Class V carious lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Aug;29(8):714-9.
Wang Hua-juan. Research on efficacy of treatment for teeth wedge-shaped defects with different materials. J Qiqihar Univ Med 2014; 35: 1333.
WANG Jia-xia. CLINICAL EFFECTS OF THE DIFFERENT MATERIALS FOR REPAIRING EDGE-SHAPED DEFECT. J Shangdong Med Coll 2011; 33: 333.
Wang Ping, Chen Jianhong, Liang Huanyou, Tang Qian, Wu Jian. Observation on the clinical effect of fluid composite resin in repairing wedge-shaped defect. J Sun Yat-Sen Univ 2007; 28: 145.
Zhu Yalin. Clinical evaluation about curative effect of restoring wedge-shaped defects by dyract AP and 3M-vitremer. Med J Chin People Health 2007; 19: 526.
XUE Yan. Observation of effects of wedge-shaped defect restored by three different materials. Med J Chin People Health 2016; 28: 31.
LIU Yuheng. Comparison of the efects of different materials
/
bonding systems combined with gingival retraction in the restoration of subgingival wedge
-
shaped defect. Mod Hosp 2017; 17: 400.
Li Bin, Liu Gendi. Observation on the effect of three kinds of materials in repairing tooth wedge-shaped defects. Mod Med J 2003; 31: 237.
Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.
Louw AJ, Sarvan I, Chikte UM, Honkala E. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth. SADJ. 2002 Sep;57(9):366-71.
CAO Jun,FENG Ping. Clinical observation of restoration of dental wedge-shaped defects with three diferent methods. Stomatol 2009; 29: 94.
Claim 1:
Mustafa D. Randomised clinical trial of four dental restorative materials. Thesis; 2005.
Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):61-6.
de Moura FR, Piva E, Lund RG, Palha B, Demarco FF. One-year clinical evaluation of two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in posterior permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2004 Summer;6(2):157-62.
Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Fall;34(1):53-8.
Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):381-8.
Lund RG, Sehn FP, Piva E, Detoni D, Moura FR, Cardoso PE, Demarco FF. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):118-23.
Claim 2:
Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results. Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):7-14.
Claim 1:
Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):315-21.